Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #16821
- Started
- Last post
- 33,864 Responses
- zarkonite0
http://www.cnn.com/2011/11/08/us…
"Health care law held constitutional in latest appeals court ruling"
- the reason they state for accepting it gives quite alot of power. i still find it unconstituitonal let be decided at least by statedeathboy
- at least at a state level no way does it garner federal controldeathboy
- I think given the national nature of insurance companies, states are not in a position of establishing efficient laws... it's a tough issue to say the least.zarkonite
- a tough issue, as a canuck my opinion is that a single payer system works better but that's another debate I guess =)zarkonite
- Yea healthcare is a rough issue. Think it better controlled through smaller parts. than a single monopoly of gov slush funds.deathboy
- funds. I know a former canuck whos family is there. All her family has kids as a form of a job. Albeit theyre catholic.deathboy
- Haha i think she has liek 55 cousins. Insane. I jsut look at the incentives and think 100% insured will drive costs up. and care down.deathboy
- care down. For exampel i got contacts. Bc insurer was paying they ran me through tons of tests. It costed me nothing so why notdeathboy
- why not. The costs are on other people. Now if 70% of 100% did this dang that wont help costsdeathboy
- Id love to go to a doctor and see menu with pricing. Theyre like cable companies these days. Most costs i dont need to use insurancedeathboy
- use insurance. I hate how insurance gets you to pay slightly less than real costs and pays doctors way more like a bribedeathboy
- bribe. Uninsured cost of a birth is much less than what an insurance will co will pay.deathboy
- i really think for the most part insurance is a large problem. A manipulative industry driving costs. And the ide amore insurance wont fix itdeathboy
- idea more insurance wont fix it.deathboy
- sry a lot of talk bubblesdeathboy