wikileaks
wikileaks
Out of context: Reply #396
- Started
- Last post
- 650 Responses
- abettertomorrow0
Actually Assange, echoing Noam Chomsky's views, has said that he thinks the 9/11 truther theories are bogus and unsubstantiated. Even if there was such a conspiracy, it's not like the people involved would write down the details in any kind of centrally stored document, much less diplomatic cables.
- I think both are playing it safe for the media because its such a hot topic.Dodecahedron
- Ok but what if? That's the kind of thing that could put even the military against the governmentPixter
- Both know better. I saw the Chomsky statement and it seemed totally ungenuineDodecahedron
- lol, maybe they are wrong, but Chomsky is the last person I would accuse of "playing it safe for the media"abettertomorrow
- Both of them have many reasons to watch what they SAY because they know a lot.Dodecahedron
- Notice neither of them ever make hugely accusational statements like shock jock alex jonesDodecahedron
- Its what they don't say that counts and chomsky oddly enough mentioned JFK conspiracy right after he talked about 911Dodecahedron
- ...about 911.Dodecahedron
- He talked about how governments periodically release info decades after the eventDodecahedron
- by the way Chomsky's reason wasn't that the "theories were unsubstantiated" it was because it was "unfeasible"Dodecahedron
- a BS counter argument if you ask me.Dodecahedron
- He wouldn't belittle government conspiracy theories because he knows how real they are.Dodecahedron
- He mentioned JFK to point out that both are red herrings.abettertomorrow
- There are enough unjust/illegal actions taken by governments that we know about anywayabettertomorrow
- well both include red herringsDodecahedron
- and his staement was in of itself a red herringDodecahedron