Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #8760
- Started
- Last post
- 33,840 Responses
- ukit0
1936 - FDR speech from a long forgotten time when liberals in America weren't ashamed of their own ideology
- Great vid. Amazing how that speech is as relevant today as it was 133 years ago.IRNlun6
- ... "73 years"IRNlun6
- think he said the underlining agenda perfectly. to subjugate people and be their master.deathboy
- tied it all up in the conclusiondeathboy
- That's an extremely poor argument. History has proven your point to be absolutely false.IRNlun6
- its the only outcome with such philosophy. id say u see it today even if its subtle or defined differentlydeathboy
- http://www.worldpoli…deathboy
- nothing scaryier. all u have to do is ask yourself how and who will provide and u see who is master and who is slavedeathboy
- I have no idea who and what you support but to me nothing is scarier than corporate interest superseding the publics interest.IRNlun6
- ... interest. I'm aware that the will of the people is not represented currently but I will continue to support it non-the-less.IRNlun6
- Our government isn't some nefarious entity it's a representation of we the people. At least that's how it's was supposed to be...IRNlun6
- ... supposed to be.IRNlun6
- i dont blame corporate interests as mush as i do the gov. do you blame a parent who gives its kid beer when the kid asksdeathboy
- or the parent. the gov has the power to leave litigation alone so as not to serve corporate interests.deathboy
- Yes. That's right FDR was our dictator. Yup. Just like Hitler. And Mussolini. We live in a vast totalitarian state for 73 years now.TheBlueOne
- years now. Sure thing.TheBlueOne
- im not sure a gov can represent the will of the people. since their is no such thing. will of one yes.deathboy
- oh and corporate interests vs mob interests are no different and a gov shouldnt cater to such thingsdeathboy
- man blue why do you always have to say such things like hitler and stuff. kind over shooting it arnt udeathboy
- It's not mob rule, it's called democracy. Not trying to be insulting, are you an anarchist?IRNlun6
- nope. what is a mob? woudl u prefer i say a majority? and do u know the purpose of a majority, a union, a mob?deathboy
- of course i'd use my terminology different but thinking of fdr values id say he wants mob ruledeathboy
- You're playing semantics. There is a distinction between a mob and a political majority.IRNlun6
- yes in the case of fdrs policy, and his economic bill of rights hes was going for mob rule.deathboy
- and msot majorities always want to take away the rights of the minority. in those cases theyre mob, if theyre notdeathboy
- then theyre likely in no need of a party/group/org and theyre fine. as long as parties or collective sorts are involved in politicsdeathboy
- the political system the percentage of mob rule is high. why would u have a group otherwisedeathboy
- hey man I have no idea who you are but trying to follow your reasoning makes my head hurtukit